What transfers? Contentment. The command to find our security and satisfaction in the Lord rather than in our possessions or our pocketbook. We are content with what we have and what can never be taken from us: God's covenantal presence. That’s what carries over from the Old Covenant to the New. Just as God was with his covenant people then, He is with his covenant people now. Just as he promised to be with them in the face of opposition then, he promises to be with us in our pocketbook persecution now.
Why join a church? The Book of Hebrews draws to a close with a description of the New Covenant Community, and a prescription that those who are called by the Lord be in community with one another in local churches.
This brings us to today’s question. Do we have now what they wrote then? This is one of the most common objections raised to the bible, particularly by Muslims and skeptics. And the idea is this, that Peter or the other Biblical authors may indeed have written something, yet over the centuries, and indeed very early on, the scriptures were copied, and then they were copied again, and then copied some more, and as they were copied they were corrupted, altered, changed, edited, revised, added to, etc, so the bottom line is that the Bible cannot be trusted as the Word of God. So the question is this, when i hold up the Bible and say, the word of God says, or the apostle Peter wrote … is what we have in our hands really what was written thousands of years ago.
J. Warner Wallace is a cold-case homicide detective. That means he investigates murders that were never solved but are then re-opened at a later time. Cold-cases have little or no hard forensic evidence, and so eyewitness statements are particularly important. Whether re-interviewing previous witnesses or identifying and interviewing new witnesses, the analysis of their testimony is critical to the possible closure of the case. Consequently, Jim Wallace was trained in ‘Forensic Statement Analysis’ – that is the scientific analysis of witness statements to determine their truth and reliability. He was used to analysing evidence and in particular knew what to look for in a reliable eyewitness statement.
Who wrote the Bible? Today’s question is not so much the question of the mind behind the Bible - that God wrote the Bible - for we’ll be discussing that matter later in the series. But today we’re going to focus on the question of authorship from the human side of the issue. Are the books of the Bible actually written by the men whose names are attached to them? 2 Peter 1:1 begins “Simeon Peter, a servant and apostle of Jesus Christ,” yet many, many scholars, the majority of scholars even, believe that it is impossible that the book we call 2 Peter was actually written by the man we call Simon Peter of Galilee, the disciple and apostle of Jesus Christ. They would claim that this letter, as others in the New Testament, is what we would call today a forgery, that is, a piece of writing written by one person claiming to be someone else.
Bart Ehrman has popularized this debate in the past few years in the book named Forged written in 2011 aimed at the regular reader. “The crucial question is this: Is it possible that any of the early Christian forgeries made it into the New Testament? That some of the books of the New Testament were not written by the apostles whose names are attached to them? That some of Paul’s letters were not actually written by Paul, but by someone claiming to be Paul? That Peter’s letters were not written by Peter? That James and Jude did not write the books that bear their names? Or…that the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were not actually written by Matthew, Mark, Luke and John? Scholars for over a hundred years have known that in fact this is the case.” (Ehrman, 10)
In 1977 at the age of 14, Sokreaksa “Reaksa” Himm saw 13 members of his family murdered by Khmer Rouge soldiers in the Killing Fields of Cambodia. Sokreaksa, along with his father and brothers were dragged to the edge of a mass grave and slashed with machetes and clubbed with hoes. Having been left for dead, he awoke in the grave in a pile of my dead and dying relatives. He was able to climb out and hide in nearby weeds when the killers left to get his mother and sisters. He watched from the bushes as they were murdered. He writes, “As the soldiers threw dirt on the people who were my entire life, I swore revenge. I was alone, hungry and scared and in the coming weeks I made my way across the jungle, avoiding soldiers by day and sleeping in trees by night to escape roaming tigers. I eventually found my way to the “safety” of a succession of refugee camps all the while planning and plotting the deaths of the men who murdered my loved ones … The anger against the killers was as great as the grief for my family and it burned inside me like a great ball of fire. For years I cultivated elaborate fantasies in which I tortured and murdered the killers again and again, projecting all my rage and pain I bottled inside myself in my plans for what I would do to the men when I found them. I realized that I would never know true peace until I had dealt with this as well.”
How would you respond? How do we respond when people wrong us.
Pop Quiz! Get a partner. number yourself either one or two. Number 2: you have forty-five seconds to share the gospel with your neighbor. Go. Ok number 1 - your turn. Go.
Sometimes we get scared of sharing our faith because we are worried, what if I get it mixed up? What if I miss something? Again, start here and keep sharing your faith until it become natural and comfortable. And don’t worry about critics. I live the story that one day a lady criticized D. L. Moody for his methods of evangelism in attempting to win people to the Lord. Moody's reply was "I agree with you. I don't like the way I do it either. Tell me, how do you do it?" The lady replied, "I don't do it." Moody retorted, "Then I like my way of doing it better than your way of not doing it."
Most modern evangelical presentations of the gospel centre on four points. We’ll go into them a little deeper later, but they are roughly, 1) something of God and his original plan for humanity 2) how every one of us messed it up by turning away from God to death and condemnation 3) what God has done for us in Jesus 4) how to respond to what God has done for us in Jesus. For example, today we’re working off of pastor Bill Hybel’s four points to ponder, the four point outline is not unique to him. Not at all. Tim Keller speaks `of the gospel as having four chapters - roughly the same four points as Hybels. Mark Dever, in his book, “The Gospel and Personal Evangelism”, shares the gospel using four questions and answers. Billy Graham’s famous tract “Steps to Peace With God” has four steps, and of course, who could overlook Power to Change’s Four Spiritual Laws!
One criticism of the “Four Step” approach is that you don’t ever clearly see the gospel shared this way in the Bible itself. I went back through most of the presentations of the gospel in the book of Acts and nearly all of the gospel presentations were a two-step approach - basically, here’s what God has done in Jesus, and here is the appropriate response. Tim Keller helps us here by clarifying that technically, the gospel is only the third point - the joyful proclamation of what God has done for us in Jesus, but that the other points set a context for the gospel that is so vital in understanding the gospel that we may share them all and call the whole thing the gospel. In Acts, the mostly Jewish audience already understood much of who God is and the consequences of sin, so they only needed to hear the good news about Jesus. As Paul took the gospel to the Romans however, he spoke to them more about the nature of God and the reality of sin, and so, in our context, a four-point gospel makes sense.
So four points, easy to memorize, easy to share. Like I said, we’re going to follow Hybel’s outline, but you’re going to get a bunch of my personality as well. I’ll also share with you some of my favorite illustrations to use. You may have your own. Here’s the point - start here and keep sharing your faith until it become natural and comfortable. So here we go - the four points. Take fingers and make guns - gospel guns. cross pointers. There you have it, God, Us, Jesus, Me.
Hybel’s outline is very easy to remember. Four words. God, Us, Jesus, You. Expanded: God loves us, We blew it, Jesus paid for it, You must Receive Him. Now remember, the first two points just set the context for the gospel, so I think they are fairly interchangeable. Sometimes, you might want to lead with God - what’s God’s like, why did he make us, what does he expect from us, and then lead to how we’ve sinned and rebelled against him. Other times, it might be more natural to start with point two - why is this world so messed up? Do you think you’re a good person? How do you know? What if you’re not? and then move into speaking of God and his holiness and love. The popular method of gospel sharing called Way of the Master starts with challenging people’s supposed goodness before moving on to God. So start with either.
- God. God Loves Us.
- God is Loving: The unique revelation of God in the Bible is that God is Love. This is not assumed in many other world religions. Hybel’s starts with this, though I find that most people in our culture assume this, yet misunderstand it because we are narcissists. Of course God loves me, I’m me! Yet there are two times I stress this one - I’m talking to someone who is broken and hurting, and needs to know that God loves them, or I’m talking to someone from an Islamic background, because it knid of freaks them out in a good way when we speak of God as loving.
- God is Holy: A harder pill to swallow is that God is holy - perfect, cannot look on or be in the presence of sin. Absolutely pure and separate from anything impure. He is perfect light, in whom there is no darkness or even shadow of turning.
- God is Just: This is perhaps the most important thing that we need to set up in our cultural context - that God is not only loving and holy, but that he is just and rightly must punish and separate from himself any evil that violates the moral fabric He has built into the universe.
- Ill: Our longing for justice. This brings us to our first illustration - our longing for justice. When someone does wrong to us, we want justice. You can see it in children, give one a bigger slice of cake, and the others scream, “That’s not fair!” We see it in ourselves when we are wronged, we want sue or have some recompense and for the person to be punished. When someone violates us, our relativistic notions of morality that we keep for ourselves get pushed out of the window. Among this younger generation there is a profound contradiction - this generation is marked for a zeal for social justice, and a relativistic morality that would insinuate that their is no such thing. Every time you complain or protest about something - check yourself, isn’t your complaint a cry out for justice? We want justice, we just don’t want it for ourselves.
- Us. We Blew It
- We sinned and become evil. We separated ourselves from God and are to be condemned to hell. We are enslaved to sin: helpless to initiate any action to change or save ourselves. The basic idea is that we have to have a sense of the bad news before we can understand and appreciate the good news. Now this may need a great deal of explanation in our culture because we don’t have a good working understanding of sin and consequences in our culture. Last week that’s where I shared that telling your story can put flesh and blood on weighty terms like sin and guilt. One vital idea is that they must understand not only that “all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God” but that they have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. Obviously it is a work of the Holy Spirit to convict the heart, but one helpful way to reveal the heart is from Ray Comfort’s Way of the Master. He uses the acronym WDJD - what did Jesus do - referring to the fact that Jesus was masterful at revealing the sinful condition of the hearts of the people he spoke to.
- W - Would you consider yourself a good person?
- D - Do you know any of the 10 commandments? Have you ever broken any of them?
- J - If God were to judge you on the basis of His moral law, would you be innocent or guilty?
- D - Destiny. Where do you think you’d end up?
- Illustration: Parking tickets. Our inability to save ourselves. Let’s say you accumulated many parking tickets over the years a couple of hundreds of dollars in fines, and you just never bothered to pay them. You didn’t think they were a big deal. Finally you are brought in to court and you still don’t think it is a big deal, I’ll just pay back the tickets now, you say. But now, because of your neglect, the problem is that the charges have become criminal and instead of a couple of hundred dollars in fines, you are fined 45,000 dollars. You can’t pay it back. So you plead, I’m sorry judge. Here, I’ll make a deal with you. I’m actually a good person. If you wave the fine, I’ll just try harder not to park illegally again. The judge says, that’s great, but you still have to pay the fine.
- The more religious a person is, the more self-assured, the more you need to press this point. Some are not ready, and you can tell and telling them the gospel at this part might do more harm than good, because if God’s not breaking their heart over their sin, then of what use it it to share with them that Jesus saves. That can lead to false conversions because Jesus just becomes a badge to justify their self-righteousness. On the other hand the more broken, the more despairing over sin, people are, the less you may have to emphasize this point, because they know that their sin brings death. Give grace to the humble, chop down the proud.
- We sinned and become evil. We separated ourselves from God and are to be condemned to hell. We are enslaved to sin: helpless to initiate any action to change or save ourselves. The basic idea is that we have to have a sense of the bad news before we can understand and appreciate the good news. Now this may need a great deal of explanation in our culture because we don’t have a good working understanding of sin and consequences in our culture. Last week that’s where I shared that telling your story can put flesh and blood on weighty terms like sin and guilt. One vital idea is that they must understand not only that “all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God” but that they have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. Obviously it is a work of the Holy Spirit to convict the heart, but one helpful way to reveal the heart is from Ray Comfort’s Way of the Master. He uses the acronym WDJD - what did Jesus do - referring to the fact that Jesus was masterful at revealing the sinful condition of the hearts of the people he spoke to.
- Christ: Christ paid for it. easy way to remember: Christmas, Good Friday and Easter.
- Christmas: Christ was God and man and therefore uniquely able to solve our dilemma.
- Good Friday: Christ died in our place as a substitute; expressed the love of God, upheld the holiness of God and satisfied the judgement of God.
- Ill: Forgiveness Costs: You break my car. If I am to forgive you, I must pay instead of forcing you to pay.
- Easter: The Spirit Gives Life Again. God raised Jesus from the dead to show that he holds the keys to life. He ascended into heaven and will return for those who await his coming. The Bible says that the same Holy Spirit that raised Jesus Christ from the dead is now at work in all who believe.
- Ill: The Judges Dilemma. A judge sees his own son. He must pronounce his son guilty, yet as a father he can pay the fine himself.
- You: I must receive Him
- Each must receive the forgiveness and leadership of Christ personally. Now here is where we tend to lose it. How do the five-points of Calvinism fit in? Can I press them to believe if I don’t know if they are elect? Should I tell them to receive the Lord, or repent, or believe?
- It is biblical to press for response. In the book of Acts, every time the gospel was presented the hearers were pressed for response.
- Receive, believe and repent are all biblical words.
- Don’t press for superficial response. Use discernment to wait for the heart to cry out, what must I do to be saved?
- Repent (turn from sinful life), Return (to God), Receive (Jesus’s new life)
- ABC: Admit you are a sinner, Believe in the Lord Jesus, Confess Him as Lord.
- I can’t, You can, Please do.
- Ill: Two religions: Do verses Done:
- Each must receive the forgiveness and leadership of Christ personally. Now here is where we tend to lose it. How do the five-points of Calvinism fit in? Can I press them to believe if I don’t know if they are elect? Should I tell them to receive the Lord, or repent, or believe?
Illustration: The Bridge
Story of humiliation after my first year of bible college.
Why should people listen to you? Tell them your story.
- All believers have a story to tell.
- People are generally open to hearing stories.
- A story is hard to argue with.
- Because you listen to them first
Paul told his personal story three times in the book of Acts and twice in the Epistles (once in Philippians and once in Galatians). We’re going to focus today on hiss telling of his story in Acts 26.
Agrippa II ruled over a large region mostly just east of the Sea of Galilee. He was grandson of Herod the Great, known in the Bible as the ruler who had the babies in Bethlehem killed near the time of Jesus’ birth. He was son of Agrippa I, who shows up earlier in the book of Acts as having beheaded James and imprisoned Peter. Even though the land under his control was far north of Judea, because of Agrippa’s expertise in Agrippa’s expertise in Jewish affairs, it was his responsibility to appoint the high priest and oversee the Jerusalem Temple’s finances. Thus, He maintained a close working relationship with the Jewish leaders and deeply understood the various theological controversies of the day.
One of the biggest of these controversies centered around the belief in the resurrection of the dead. There were basically two strong parties in this controversy. The Sadducees oversaw the maintenance of the Temple and oversaw many of the civil affairs of the people. The Sadducees were an interesting bunch, because even though they kept the Temple, they were actually pretty secular. They minimized God’s involvement in the world’s affairs and rejected any belief in an afterlife or resurrection. You might remember the time that the Sadducees tried to trap Jesus by asking about the woman who had seven husbands - whose wife would she be in the resurrection? They were trying to trap Jesus by demonstrating the absurdity of life after death (Jesus of course schooled them). The Pharisees, on the other hand, affirmed the resurrection and God’s involvement in the world as its judge.
Paul knew that Agrippa was familiar with all of the controversies of the Jews and so he started there:
“I consider myself fortunate that it is before you, King Agrippa, I am going to make my defense today against all the accusations of the Jews, especially because you are familiar with all the customs and controversies of the Jews. Therefore I beg you to listen to me patiently”
So he starts by just simply identifying himself by the categories that Agrippa was familiar with. This is called “Finding Common Ground”
It is interesting that another time in Acts when Paul shares his story, he is in front of a mob. In Acts 22, Paul doesn’t stress his Pharisee credentials or expose his familiarity with Jewish controversies, but instead emphasizes the zeal for God he had as a Jewish man. “I am a Jew, born in Tarsus in Cilicia, but brought up in this city, educated at the feet of Gamaliel according to the strict manner of the law of our fathers, being zealous for God as all of you are this day. I persecuted this Way to the death, binding and delivering to prison both men and women, as the high priest and the whole council of elders can bear me witness. From them I received letters to the brothers, and I journeyed toward Damascus to take those also who were there and bring them in bonds to Jerusalem to be punished.” Why would he emphasize his zeal and his attempt to persecute members of the Way of Christ? Because that’s what his audience was doing! I was just like you are!
For me personally, I have a number of ways of sharing my story. I often tell my story emphasizing that I basically grew up not believing in God in an secular agnostic family. Yet if I am talking to a lapsed Catholic, I’ll pull out my Catholic card. I come from a line of Irish Catholics and did the whole baptism, catechism, first communion thing, but religion never took to me. Both stories are a true part of my story, but I emphasize different parts depending on whom I am talking to. To blue-collar hard working people, I emphasize the work ethic my parents instilled in me, and the barrier that was to my understanding of the gospel. That’s all part of my story, so when I tell my story, I’m searching for common ground.
Each time Paul tells his story, he hangs it on three handles, which we’ll signify with: BC , cross, AD.
BC:
“My manner of life from my youth, spent from the beginning among my own nation and in Jerusalem, is known by all the Jews. They have known for a long time, if they are willing to testify, that according to the strictest party of our religion I have lived as a Pharisee. And now I stand here on trial because of my hope in the promise made by God to our fathers, to which our twelve tribes hope to attain, as they earnestly worship night and day. And for this hope I am accused by Jews, O king! Why is it thought incredible by any of you that God raises the dead?
“I myself was convinced that I ought to do many things in opposing the name of Jesus of Nazareth. And I did so in Jerusalem. I not only locked up many of the saints in prison after receiving authority from the chief priests, but when they were put to death I cast my vote against them. And I punished them often in all the synagogues and tried to make them blaspheme, and in raging fury against them I persecuted them even to foreign cities.
Notice how Paul then goes into his own story of who he was before Christ. Yet he does so very concisely and ties in his backstory with the common ground theme that he hopes will keep Agrippa’s interest. He identifies himself with the Pharisee’s, placing himself in the centre of the Jewish controversy over the resurrection. Also, as we go on in the conversation it seems clear that this also happened to be the side that Agrippa was most sympathetic to. So Paul is again building bridges and finding common ground. After bringing up the key point of the resurrection of the dead, Paul then turns his story to tell of his initial reaction to Jesus. He shares his internal thoughts: “I was convinced that I ought to do many things in opposing the name of Jesus of Nazareth.” Interestingly, where many Pharisees may have thought that someone should do something about the Christian movement, Paul’s beliefs led him to action. This is Paul’s confession. A confession is a part of telling your story in which you open up a bit of the sinfulness your life to the person. They need to see concrete examples of what sin looks like. Instead of telling someone, “All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God” your showing them what sin actually looks like with flesh and bone on it in the story of your own life.
- I not only locked up many of the saints in prison after receiving authority from the chief priests, [he calls Christians, “saints”
- but when they were put to death I cast my vote against them.
- And I punished them often in all the synagogues and tried to make them blaspheme,
- and in raging fury against them I persecuted them even to foreign cities [notice, not “righteous anger” or “theological zeal” but “raging fury” I was out of control. ]
This is why your story is so effective. If you just say, “You’re a sinner” - well, maybe they don’t even know what sin is, and you risk offending them with a religious label that mean’s very little or nothing to them. But when you say you were acting out of control with raging fury, and giving details of how your sin consumed you, that speaks to the heart and illustrates for them what you mean when you say “all have sinned.” Don’t skip over your confession in telling your story.
Jesus
“In this connection I journeyed to Damascus with the authority and commission of the chief priests. At midday, O king, I saw on the way a light from heaven, brighter than the sun, that shone around me and those who journeyed with me. And when we had all fallen to the ground, I heard a voice saying to me in the Hebrew language, ‘Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me? It is hard for you to kick against the goads.’And I said, ‘Who are you, Lord?’ And the Lord said, ‘I am Jesus whom you are persecuting. But rise and stand upon your feet, for I have appeared to you for this purpose, to appoint you as a servant and witness to the things in which you have seen me and to those in which I will appear to you, delivering you from your people and from the Gentiles—to whom I am sending you to open their eyes, so that they may turn from darkness to light and from the power of Satan to God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins and a place among those who are sanctified by faith in me.’
Paul goes on to tell of his personal encounter with Christ. Obviously, here is something different and personal to each one of us. Describe what led you to the Lord. What was the moment that the Holy Spirit led you to the son of God? Again - this is the part that no one can really argue with, it is your story. I saw a bright light and heard a voice from heaven. Now I can provide a different interpretation of your subjective experience, but I can’t deny that in your mind something happened. It’s good to do this for yourself - I call it the objective subjective experience proof of faith. I know what I’ve experienced. It might be subjective to you, but it is objective to me because I was there. Christ changed my life. this is what carried me though a severe time of doubt that I had in university. I had to remind myself that God had met me. To deny him would be like to deny my own mom’s existence. JI Packer starts out his book, knowing God telling the story of an old man who stood at the back of an audience shaking his head as a speaker attacked the Christian faith. Knowing the man to be a Christian,
As Paul put it, “I know whom I have believed and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I’ve committed unto him until that day.” Notice, not “I know what I’ve believed” or “I know that I’ve believed” but “I know whom” - ‘Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me? It is hard for you to kick against the goads.’And I said, ‘Who are you, Lord?’ And the Lord said, ‘I am Jesus whom you are persecuting. Paul knew whom he had believed. The who is important because, again, you can tell people Christianity is a relationship, not a religion, but until they see the who with whom you are relationship with, that is only a cliche, and a non-sensical one at that.
In addition to the whom, there is the how - this is a great time in the telling of your story that you start explaining to the person how they can be saved. Notice how subtle this is in Paul’s telling of his story: Jesus told me, Paul says, to go everywhere and tell everyone to open their eyes, so that they may turn from darkness to light and from the power of Satan to God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins and a place among those who are sanctified by faith in me.’ The gospel is the proclamation of what God has done for us in Christ, but just because you’re “sharing your story” doesn’t mean that you skip over the proclamation.
AD
“Therefore, O King Agrippa, I was not disobedient to the heavenly vision, but declared first to those in Damascus, then in Jerusalem and throughout all the region of Judea, and also to the Gentiles, that they should repent and turn to God, performing deeds in keeping with their repentance. For this reason the Jews seized me in the temple and tried to kill me. To this day I have had the help that comes from God, and so I stand here testifying both to small and great, saying nothing but what the prophets and Moses said would come to pass: that the Christ must suffer and that, by being the first to rise from the dead, he would proclaim light both to our people and to the Gentiles.”
The final part of you story is how God changed you since coming to Christ. Paul speaks of his obedience to the Lord Jesus’ words and how ever since he has had in his ministry “the help that comes from God”. Nothing testifies to the truth of the gospel like you’re own changed life. As D.L. Moody once said, “Out of 100 men, one will read the Bible, the other 99 will read the Christian.”
How has Christ changed your life?
Notice the effective part of the story - there is radical change and there is thematic continuity. What I mean is, the radical change (I once hated Christians and wanted to see them all arrested and killed off, to now I go everywhere declaring the message of the Christians and people want to arrest and kill me). But there is also thematic continuity - I once participated in controversies around the resurrection of the dead as a Pharisee, yet now because of Jesus I understand with greater clarity more than ever before in my life that the dead are raised, because the scripture teach that the Christ must raise, I know I know the Christ who has been raised!
We call this a unifying theme. For Paul the two things that tied his story together was his intense passion for serving God and his and Agrippa’s shared interest in the resurrection.
The Concluding Question
And as he was saying these things in his defense, Festus said with a loud voice, “Paul, you are out of your mind; your great learning is driving you out of your mind.” But Paul said, “I am not out of my mind, most excellent Festus, but I am speaking true and rational words. For the king knows about these things, and to him I speak boldly. For I am persuaded that none of these things has escaped his notice, for this has not been done in a corner. King Agrippa, do you believe the prophets? I know that you believe.”
Paul directly confronts Agrippa with a question of response: Do you believe the prophets?
And Agrippa said to Paul, “In a short time would you persuade me to be a Christian?”And Paul said, “Whether short or long, I would to God that not only you but also all who hear me this day might become such as I am—except for these chains.”
Other Concluding Questions
- So, that’s what happened to me, can you relate to any of it?
- Does any of this make any sense to you?
- How about you — what’s your spiritual background?
- Were you taught any of this growing up, or maybe I can ask, what do you believe?
- Would you like to know how you can know Jesus Christ?
Ask people about themselves. Listen to their story.
I shared on Friday that Thanksgiving in my dad’s house was always a bit strange. Thanksgiving was my dad’s favorite holiday, but we didn’t celebrate it like anyone else. First, we never had turkey. He didn’t like it. So we’d have tacos, or spaghetti, or tuna salad. So really, thanksgiving dinner was just like any other meal. But not entirely like any other meal, because my dad would give his thanksgiving speech. This was no regular thanksgiving speech. Oh, it started like a speech that most people might say before Thanksgiving - he’d start out by saying how thankful that he was for us kids and for his health - but then the speech would go off in a different direction. See, my dad was really into “The Power of Positive Thinking” and self-actualization gurus. His motto for life was that, “If your brain can conceive it, and your heart, can believe it, than you can achieve it.” So the rest of my dad’s Thanksgiving speech was a pep talk of how we create our own reality and produce our own blessings. Then we’d get gifts. Now, my dad is not a gift-giver. Birthdays and Christmas hit and miss, but Thanksgiving, we’d get gifts. The gifts were always the same - a new self-help book. Then we’d eat.
As I became a Christian, the irony of Thanksgiving at my dad’s house struck me. While Thanksgiving was his favorite holiday, it seemed to me that he missed the point. There didn’t seem to be a lot of thankfulness in his speech. Think about it, what would you think if you gave me a present, like bought me a car or something, and then I responded with a speech in which I credited my own attitude and positive thinking that produced such blessing in my life. You’d be like - it wasn’t your positive thinking that got you that car, I gave you it! See, giving thanks implies that there has to be someone to give thanks to. This is not just nit-picking - giving thanks, and to whom we give thanks, is an essential part of the Christian faith, the heart of the gospel.